"
So is the calculation:
(Mana * %mana passives) + (Energy Shield * %energy shield passives)
Or
(Mana + (Energy Shield * %energy shield passives) ) * %mana passives
No, it is not.
It's
(Mana * %mana increases) + (ES * (%ES increases + %mana increases))
Última edição por Mark_GGG em 30 de jan de 2013 20:10:13
|
Postado porMark_GGGem 30 de jan de 2013 20:09:46Grinding Gear Games
|
"
"
So is the calculation:
(Mana * %mana passives) + (Energy Shield * %energy shield passives)
Or
(Mana + (Energy Shield * %energy shield passives) ) * %mana passives
No, it is not.
It's
(Mana * %mana increases) + (ES * (%ES increases + %mana increases))
Wow, % of mana is much better than % of ES if you really want mana. Usefull info :)
Última edição por fAnts em 30 de jan de 2013 21:45:34
|
Postado porfAntsem 30 de jan de 2013 21:44:34
|
"
"
It's
(Mana * %mana increases) + (ES * (%ES increases + %mana increases))
Wow, % of mana is much better than % of ES if you really want mana. Usefull info :)
That, and plain Intelligence. Savant's +30 Intelligence is 6% increased Energy Shield and +15 mana (the 15 mana then gets multiplied by your mana% passives).
When Stephen Colbert was killed by HYDRA's Project Insight in 2014, the comedy world lost a hero. Since his life model decoy isn't up to the task, please do not mistake my performance as political discussion. I'm just doing what Steve would have wanted.
|
Postado porScrotieMcBem 30 de jan de 2013 23:21:06
|
"
"
So is the calculation:
(Mana * %mana passives) + (Energy Shield * %energy shield passives)
Or
(Mana + (Energy Shield * %energy shield passives) ) * %mana passives
No, it is not.
It's
(Mana * %mana increases) + (ES * (%ES increases + %mana increases))
Sorry to pull a slight necro, but is this information still correct?
|
Postado porNa_Krulem 29 de ago de 2014 16:16:26
|
Yes.
|
Postado porVipermagiem 30 de ago de 2014 05:27:54Membro Valioso
|