Price check Bringer of rain

"
topcatti escreveu:

What? Unless you have "godly" rolled helmet and armor you basicly dont lose any armor.


Some junk I found recently in Catacombs



Add common 1.5K armour chest...
Última edição por dima_dunedin em 23 de mai de 2013 11:56:13
"
dima_dunedin escreveu:
"
PabloCappone escreveu:

read man... have 3 sup so with 4l.. = 7L .... so lol(?)


3 sups, yes. But something tells me you will do much better with 6L and 2 sups of your own choice


Also those gems are limited to level 18

also those gems can t be upgraded.

Also abyssus do more damages with a chest.
Forum pvp
"
boof escreveu:
Do gems socketed into that helm get the mana cost multiplier of the stat-supports?


thats the most important question dear mate...
Wise words buff -> balance <- nerf , need to happen , deal with it
"
PabloCappone escreveu:
"
boof escreveu:
Do gems socketed into that helm get the mana cost multiplier of the stat-supports?


thats the most important question dear mate...


Well jump on in game and test it!
"
boof escreveu:
"
PabloCappone escreveu:
"
boof escreveu:
Do gems socketed into that helm get the mana cost multiplier of the stat-supports?


thats the most important question dear mate...


Well jump on in game and test it!


They don't. At least not with Rime Gaze.
No. Calm down. Learn to enjoy losing.
"
boof escreveu:
What the fucking fuck????


edit: oh can't use chest armor, just saw that. Was about to lose it for a minute there. Still epic.


Kaom's is still more OP than what that helmet would have been without the "no chest" clause.
This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
I do agree this is an interesting piece of equipment, but as usual for PoE uniques it can be easily beaten by good rares. Which are maybe more rare than uniques on the other side
Última edição por dima_dunedin em 23 de mai de 2013 12:10:17
"
dima_dunedin escreveu:
I do agree this is an interesting piece of equipment, but as usual for PoE uniques it can be easily beaten by good rares. Which are maybe more rare than uniques on the other side


If the game was perfectly designed then the best rares should beat the best uniques for every slot. Kaom's is the big exception to this rule, and it is hard to also beat Lioneye's.
This message was delivered by GGG defence force.
"
mazul escreveu:

If the game was perfectly designed then the best rares should beat the best uniques for every slot.


Why?
[mod edit: removed]
Última edição por Henry_GGG em 23 de mai de 2013 14:56:23

Reportar Post do Fórum

Reportar Conta:

Tipo de Reporte

Informação Adicional