"
K2ThaYo escreveu:
"
rossidis escreveu:
"
Skill Balance:
Cast On Damage Taken: The level requirement of gems augmented by Cast on Damage Taken may not exceed the level requirement of the Cast on Damage Taken gem.
GG just as i started leveling this.
well, then i guess this will FUC* up the most OP builds arround here... this means, if you want to cast a curse lvl 10 your codt will have to be a higher lvl, so you take more dmg and can cast less curses.
lets see how it will work...
I think you read it wrong. It's the level requirement and not the gem level.
CwDT lvl 1 requires you to have lvl 31. So all linked gems would have to require player lvl 31 or less - at least that's how I read it.
|
Postado porhyper_ch#1759em 12 de nov. de 2013 06:01:55Banido
|
"
Rayman161 escreveu:
now That cwdt is less effective is this build still going to be effective?
I think so. The build mainly uses a high crit chance of daggers to spam EK - which also have a high crit chance then.
|
Postado porhyper_ch#1759em 12 de nov. de 2013 06:03:02Banido
|
"
Rayman161 escreveu:
now That cwdt is less effective is this build still going to be effective?
obviously, instead of doing multiple knives per 440damage taken
you now need to take 2400+ damage to shoot them. builds nerfed to shit.
|
Postado porrossidis#1241em 12 de nov. de 2013 06:09:43
|
"
hyper_ch escreveu:
"
K2ThaYo escreveu:
well, then i guess this will FUC* up the most OP builds arround here... this means, if you want to cast a curse lvl 10 your codt will have to be a higher lvl, so you take more dmg and can cast less curses.
lets see how it will work...
I think you read it wrong. It's the level requirement and not the gem level.
CwDT lvl 1 requires you to have lvl 31. So all linked gems would have to require player lvl 31 or less - at least that's how I read it.
U read wrong, K2ThaYo is correct.
U obviously need to be higher level than the equipped gem. That is since day 1...
Última edição por Xafniko#2537 em 12 de nov. de 2013 06:30:15
|
Postado porXafniko#2537em 12 de nov. de 2013 06:29:01
|
"
Xafniko escreveu:
U read wrong, K2ThaYo is correct.
U obviously need to be higher level than the equipped gem. That is since day 1...
You missunderstand.
Your toon is lvl 70
CwDT on lvl 1 requires toon lvl 31
MOlten Shell lvl 7 requires toon lvl 28
This means, as lvl 70 toon you can equip CwDT at lvl 1. Since the molten shell lvl 7 requires toon lvl 28 it is still less than the toon lvl required by lvl 1 CwDT.
So, you can still use Molten Shell lvl 7 with a CwDT lvl 1
|
Postado porhyper_ch#1759em 12 de nov. de 2013 06:33:04Banido
|
"
hyper_ch escreveu:
You missunderstand.
Your toon is lvl 70
CwDT on lvl 1 requires toon lvl 31
MOlten Shell lvl 7 requires toon lvl 28
This means, as lvl 70 toon you can equip CwDT at lvl 1. Since the molten shell lvl 7 requires toon lvl 28 it is still less than the toon lvl required by lvl 1 CwDT.
So, you can still use Molten Shell lvl 7 with a CwDT lvl 1
Oh, ok, i get what u mean. Could be a possibility, but i feel the 1st scenario is more likely to happen.
|
Postado porXafniko#2537em 12 de nov. de 2013 07:19:32
|
that seems to be the consens on how CwDT works after patch... based on required level
|
Postado porhyper_ch#1759em 12 de nov. de 2013 07:45:57Banido
|
"
rossidis escreveu:
"
Skill Balance:
Cast On Damage Taken: The level requirement of gems augmented by Cast on Damage Taken may not exceed the level requirement of the Cast on Damage Taken gem.
GG just as i started leveling this.
That was predictable ...
|
Postado porIsami#3028em 12 de nov. de 2013 07:48:04
|
will this build still possible to play with the nerf of CoDT?
|
Postado porm0tY#4520em 12 de nov. de 2013 11:39:38
|
build is still possible, just get enough mana regen, so u can sustain cyclone.
replace mana leech gem with life leech + get vaal pact.
6L = cyclone + life leech + cast on crit + 3x ek.
still u can use endurance cry + molten shell + immortal call.. but lower level.
the caodt + ek wont work anymore on lv1. u can still level it, u will ton of damage but the cast time is alot lower now.
|
Postado poryorick1992#5897em 12 de nov. de 2013 13:10:52
|