"
DirkAustin escreveu:
... WHy change this game with GGGs vision of trading when you can make your own game?
...
GGGs vision was to offer custom leagues for cash shop coins.
i mean i get it, game is dying. playerbase is already so low that they just cant keep this promise. GGG is the only one who is changing their vision.
|
Postado porPoorJoy#0048em 28 de abr. de 2014 10:36:26
|
"
DirkAustin escreveu:
... WHy change this game with GGGs vision of trading when you can make your own game?
...
The current iteration is far from the advertised *vision* of trading that GGG originally gave us.
I'll go so far as to say that the current iteration of trade in game is/was players *vision* of trading.
=)
|
Postado porTemper#7820em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:29:42
|
"
Jake_GGG escreveu:
Please refrain from antagonizing or insulting other players. Further posts of this kind may result in the player being placed on probation.
Call the Chris to give a fking answer on this forum.
http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2013/076/7/0/trafalgar_law___room__by_niklaswirths-d5ycuxx.jpg
|
|
"
Xavderion escreveu:
I'd say the number one characteristic of a casual player is that he doesn't want to invest either time or actually himself (if that makes sense) in order to have some fun with a game.
To answer your questions, chess can be a casual game, it's very easy to learn. And playing Temple Run 6+ hours a day makes someone a hardcore Temple Run player, yes. If he does this with most games he plays, then he's a hardcore gamer, yes.
Agreed.
How can you comment on these assumptions that casuals want SFL?
Why is someone, who wants to gear up (competitively) with killing monsters a casual, and the one who gears up through trade a hardcore player?
That's the biggest argument from anti-SFL crowd, and I personally think that it's crap.
@aldorus
Thanks for the nice post.
I'm curious what would the results be with a SFL poll, a real ingame poll.
To check how many players would be interested, and then make a business decision, either to make it as a 20$ fee or just make it free and go on with donations, or don't do nothing.
I really believe it wouldn't fail based on money part.
|
Postado portinko92#6447em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:31:14
|
"
PoorJoy escreveu:
"
DirkAustin escreveu:
... WHy change this game with GGGs vision of trading when you can make your own game?
...
GGGs vision was to offer custom leagues for cash shop coins.
i mean i get it, game is dying. playerbase is already so low that they just cant keep this promise. GGG is the only one who is changing their vision.
Cool story bro.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
Postado porXavderion#3432em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:32:00
|
"
tinko92 escreveu:
"
Xavderion escreveu:
I'd say the number one characteristic of a casual player is that he doesn't want to invest either time or actually himself (if that makes sense) in order to have some fun with a game.
To answer your questions, chess can be a casual game, it's very easy to learn. And playing Temple Run 6+ hours a day makes someone a hardcore Temple Run player, yes. If he does this with most games he plays, then he's a hardcore gamer, yes.
Agreed.
How can you comment on these assumptions that casuals want SFL?
Why is someone, who wants to gear up (competitively) with killing monsters a casual, and the one who gears up through trade a hardcore player?
That's the biggest argument from anti-SFL crowd, and I personally think that it's crap.
Hm, wanting a SFL doesn't make anyone casual, that's nonsense. What might happen though is that the game might become easier in a SFL. Really depends on how GGG would balance it.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
Postado porXavderion#3432em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:34:32
|
Sorry, but that is a fallacy. PoE is definitely easier right now than it will ever be in a SFL. Simply because of poe.xyz, RMT, botting, and trading in general. In the current situation, you can buy everything you desire instantly. Even if a shavronne's dropped every piety kill, you'd still have to kill it and it's less than instant so harder.
|
Postado porglh5#3285em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:37:16
|
"
Xavderion escreveu:
Hm, wanting a SFL doesn't make anyone casual, that's nonsense. What might happen though is that the game might become easier in a SFL. Really depends on how GGG would balance it.
They'd have to try very very hard to make self found,especially solo self found any easier than trade enabled. lol
|
Postado porTemper#7820em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:37:48
|
I'd play a self found league.
|
Postado porKillBlizzard#1886em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:38:46
|
"
glh5 escreveu:
Sorry, but that is a fallacy. PoE is definitely easier right now than it will ever be in a SFL. Simply because of poe.xyz, RMT, botting, and trading in general. In the current situation, you can buy everything you desire instantly. Even if a shavronne's dropped every piety kill, you'd still have to kill it and it's less than instant so harder.
Yes, if you cheat. In a SFL, you can also buy an account with a Shavronne's for real money. Your point is invalid.
GGG banning all political discussion shortly after getting acquired by China is a weird coincidence.
|
Postado porXavderion#3432em 28 de abr. de 2014 11:39:23
|