streamer rng or just always unlucky?

"

Phrazz escreveu:

"

DarthSki44 escreveu:

It's probably somewhere in-between.

It would be freakin' suicide for them (GGG) to have streamer RNG, if it somehow got out there. It's not worth the trouble, nor the gain. It would only take one anonymous employee with some sense of morals.

I believe more in bias, than I do in streamer RNG, because confirmation bias is, unlike streamer RNG, a proven fact - that happens - all the time - everywhere. People don't like to think about streamers playing five times as much as them. People don't like to think about some streamers playing five times as efficient as them. People don't like to think about streamers are rolling five times as many dices as them.

They see a streamer getting lucky a few times, often in compilations, and their mind automatically goes "this doesn't happen to me that often, but it happens to streamers all the time". Maybe not you, maybe not Jimmy, but you know as well as me that a lot of the suspicion comes from examples like that.

Suspicions? You're allowed. Hell, you're allowed to think that the earth is flat too. But to be sure/convinced that the earth is flat - without proof, just because you don't trust the people saying it's round, even though they've done some bad shit? Nah, man.

"

DarthSki44 escreveu:

Idk man, we have had other developers admit this type of behavior before so it's not without precedent.

Dont forgot that before Tencent bought out GGG, they had ownership, with stake in the game, also owning websites selling GGG currency. If that isnt FUBAR idk what is.

So believe whatever you want, but GGG is not some beacon of humanity. I think their ethics are HIGHLY suspect, and I would be surprised by nothing.

"

DoubleU escreveu:

A priority queue is not proof that they buff streamer drops.
Yes, they can manually adjust drops, but if you think that this game does it then surely you must think that most other games do it.